Spouse of former FTX govt seeks to preclude her husband’s responsible plea
In a Friday submitting with the US District Courtroom for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) over marketing campaign finance expenses, Michelle Bond’s authorized group requested the courtroom to contemplate precluding proof associated to former FTX Digital Markets co-CEO Ryan Salame, her husband who’s presently serving a 90-month sentence after he pleaded responsible in 2023.
Bond faces marketing campaign finance expenses alleging that her unsuccessful 2022 congressional run in New York was partially funded by contributions from FTX facilitated by Salame. As a part of the filings this week, Bond requested the courtroom to exclude proof of her husband’s responsible plea and “associated plea supplies,” through which the previous govt admitted to creating “political contributions in [his] title that had been funded by transfers from the financial institution accounts” of an entity tied to FTX.
“The Courtroom ought to preclude the federal government from introducing or referring to Mr. Salame’s responsible plea or any associated plea supplies, as a result of their minimal probative worth is considerably outweighed by the chance of unfair prejudice to Ms. Bond,” stated the submitting.
Bond’s attorneys added:
“[…] Mr. Salame’s plea supplies lack any probative worth as to Ms. Bond’s guilt, data, or intent. Mr. Salame’s plea is an admission of his personal guilt, not proof of Ms. Bond’s frame of mind or participation in any charged offense.”
The movement additionally requested the courtroom embrace data associated to Bond’s “contemporaneous divorce and custody proceedings,” arguing that although she and Salame weren’t married on the time of the alleged crime, the previous FTX govt was not an “strange ‘particular person’ donor” contributing to her marketing campaign.
Associated: US Senate unanimously adopts decision opposing clemency for SBF
The legal case is likely one of the newest involving people tied to the defunct crypto change following its 2022 collapse. Salame, former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried and former Alameda Analysis CEO Caroline Ellison had been all sentenced to jail for his or her function within the misuse of buyer funds and associated expenses.
Former congressman ordered to pay $35,000 over Kalshi wager
George Santos, a former New York Home consultant who was expelled from Congress in 2023, was ordered to pay a $17,500 civil financial penalty and $17,570 in disgorgement from income earned over bets positioned on prediction markets platform Kalshi. The order from the US Commodity Futures Buying and selling Fee (CFTC) stemmed from Santos buying and selling on occasion contracts betting on his look on the 2026 State of the Union deal with in Washington, DC.
“Whereas shopping for and promoting positions on this market, Santos posted on social media about his plans to attend or not attend the SOTU,” stated the CFTC. “In his social media posts, Santos made a sequence of fabric misrepresentations and omissions about whether or not he would attend the SOTU. After these posts, the SOTU contract costs moved in a route that was favorable to Santos’ positions which allowed him to make over $17,500.”
February X publish about his State of the Union attendance. Supply: George Santos
Santos is barred from buying and selling on prediction market platforms for 3 years as a part of the order. He was additionally beforehand sentenced to 87 months in jail for wire fraud and aggravated identification theft in 2025, however served solely three months earlier than his sentence was commuted by US President Donald Trump.
US solider accused of creating $400,000 Polymarket wager seeks to dismiss expenses
Gannon Ken Van Dyke is a US soldier who faces expenses for allegedly making greater than $400,000 on Polymarket occasion contracts utilizing nonpublic data tied to a army operation involving the removing of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro in January. He was concerned within the operation eradicating Maduro, in response to the US Justice Division, and allegedly used insider data to wager whether or not the Venezuelan president can be faraway from energy, resulting in legal expenses in April.
In a Friday SDNY submitting, Van Dyke’s authorized group filed a 51-page memo in assist of a movement to dismiss the indictment based mostly on totally different authorized theories, together with that the Commodity Trade Act (CEA) on the middle of three of the costs was “ambiguous” in treating occasion contracts as “swaps.”
Though the CFTC below Chair Michael Selig has claimed that the company has “unique jurisdiction” over prediction markets on the idea that occasion contracts are handled as “swaps,” Van Dyke’s attorneys stated the shortage of readability was adequate to dismiss among the expenses.
“If Congress, govt department companies, and courts all discover the ‘swap’ definition ambiguous, how can strange residents have honest discover that prediction market wagers are coated by the CEA?” stated the submitting. “They can not.”
The case is predicted to have vital implications for lawmakers and authorities officers utilizing prediction markets. Trump’s teleprompter operator reportedly made greater than $100,000 utilizing Kalshi occasion contracts associated to the president’s speeches.
Primarily based on a schedule filed in June, Van Dyke is probably taking a look at a trial starting in late 2026 or early 2027. He has pleaded not responsible to all expenses.
Journal: Right here’s why the CLARITY Act’s ethics deal could also be so laborious to succeed in