
âÂÂWe want the best league in the worldâÂÂ: BathâÂÂs Bruce Craig on 16 years at the Rec
BathâÂÂs co-owner and âÂÂwily old foxâ on the need for Champions Cup change and the future of the Prem
It doesnâÂÂt feel like 16 years since Bruce Craig first shared his vision for Bath Rugby with the Guardian. Back then there were plenty wondering if his extravagant ambitions would be realised and even he describes it as âÂÂa long haulâ at times. âÂÂIt has been a lot more difficult than I anticipated. Anyone would have wanted it to happen a lot quicker than it actually has. But anything worthwhile is difficult and takes a long time.âÂÂ
It has also taught him loads about the inner workings of professional rugby. âÂÂIâÂÂm not the new young buck on the block I was a few years ago, IâÂÂm the old wily fox now.â These days he compares it to a âÂÂfour-dimensionalâ puzzle, even for the wealthiest owners. âÂÂWhen you come from business into rugby you probably think there would be a lot of crossovers. But itâÂÂs different. In business ⦠itâÂÂs a lot easier to get the outcomes.âÂÂ
At least his perseverance is finally being rewarded. Bath claimed their first league title for 29 years in 2025 and work commences next spring on the Rec 2.0, the clubâÂÂs refurbished city centre stadium beside the Avon, made possible by the backing of he and his billionaire co-owner, James Dyson. Any word yet on a name? The Dyson Dome? The Stadium of Bruce? A loud snort is audible â âÂÂIâÂÂve never been that sort of personâ â down the line from Spain. âÂÂWeâÂÂre starting in March and we should finish by September 2028 when weâÂÂll hand over the facilities the club should have. ThatâÂÂll be amazing.âÂÂ
His pride in the clubâÂÂs newfound stability under Johann van Graan, strengthened academy, spectacular training base and soon-to-arrive new colosseum is understandable but a few frustrations remain. Even a Dyson-funded Bath cannot exist in a vacuum and Craig, now 63, continues to wince â âÂÂItâÂÂs probably the biggest problem in rugby stillâ â at the âÂÂshortsightedness and small mindednessâ of those who cannot see his bigger picture.

The mothballing of the proposed World Club Championship is one irritation, as is the Champions Cup. On the eve of BathâÂÂs opening pool game against Montpellier he is less than impressed by proposals for home-and-away ties in the last 16 and quarter-finals in a revamped 16-team competition. âÂÂIâÂÂm not sure itâÂÂs the ideal. The second games could be dead rubbers. If you want real jeopardy youâÂÂve got to go to straight knockout. Then every one of those games would be top notch.âÂÂ
There are even mutterings, from other sources, that some clubs might consider serving notice in 2028 of their intention to leave the existing tournament and start afresh from 2030. Craig is aware of the whispers and does not sound averse to a rethink. âÂÂBy the end of the year I think there needs to be a direction of travel between La Ligue Nationale de Rugby, the United Rugby Championship and the Prem. For the moment I donâÂÂt think thereâÂÂs commonality on anything. We really need to get a right answer because otherwise it just doesnâÂÂt work with punters, commercially or TV-wise. It needs resolution.âÂÂ
That statement is guaranteed to prompt wry smiles across the Irish Sea. It was Craig and the English clubs, after all, who pressed for contentious changes to the original union-run Heineken Cup. In retrospect, he accepts there were some misjudgments. âÂÂThe big error was trying to go to the Champions League scenario [involving multiple partner sponsors]. But that didnâÂÂt transpire and that was an error. It was tried but not everything works. And then dropping down to eight weekends and everyone not playing each other in their pool ⦠I just think itâÂÂs lost something. Where it is now is not doing it for anyone.âÂÂ
He still believes, even so, that the previous shake-up over a decade ago was entirely justified. âÂÂThe initial change was absolutely right. I fundamentally believe Europe should have been owned by the three leagues and not by unions. With unions and clubs youâÂÂve got two different species trying to find the same path. ItâÂÂs a club competition.âÂÂ
Meanwhile, with Newcastle Red Bulls and ExeterâÂÂs new American backers Black Knight now part of the family, Craig reckons it only requires significant fresh investment into one more club to tilt the scales domestically and make possible a rise in the Prem salary cap. âÂÂFor these billionaire corporates and individuals, ã6.4m is nothing. ItâÂÂs not even change. So once you get to a critical mass in terms of a corporate objective, itâÂÂs like: âÂÂHey, guys, letâÂÂs go.â We want to be the best league in the world.âÂÂ

Part of that latter equation, he predicts, will be Prem expansion to help generate more income and interest. He would also be happy to involve the Welsh regions. âÂÂI think we absolutely need 12 teams. And there are certainly advantages to the Welsh if they can sort their situations out. They would have to be private clubs, so for example Cardiff would have to be spun off [from Welsh Rugby Union ownership]. But the advantages are huge for Welsh rugby and I think it would be good for the Prem. YouâÂÂve got the rivalry, the tribalism, the proximity, the travel. Tick, tick, tick, tick.âÂÂ
By now it should be clear that CraigâÂÂs passion for rugby still burns bright. The one-time scrum-half from Chew Magna also yearns for the day the RFU no longer oversees the top tier of the club game. âÂÂThere should be a company running the commercial and sporting side of England professional rugby. I do think in the next five years we will see a big sea change in English club rugby.â Despite a tricky financial climate, he sniffs opportunity. âÂÂSome people will think itâÂÂs not for the better but other people will look at it and go: âÂÂWow.âÂÂ
âÂÂThe English want to be at the same level [as the French and Irish sides]. Why are you going into sport if you havenâÂÂt got the aspirations to be winning leagues, to be winning Europe and for England to win the World Cup?âÂÂ
And if he could shatter one common preconception it would be that he and his ilk are purely driven by money. âÂÂSometimes in the press you can get portrayed in a certain way, which is not necessarily the truth. IâÂÂm âÂÂa wealthy owner with private jetsâ and that sort of stuff. I mean, thatâÂÂs bullshit. First and foremost, I invested a lot of money into rugby because I love it. ItâÂÂs my passion and thatâÂÂs what I love doing.
âÂÂI want rugby to be much more widely distributed in the world and for many more people to play the game, because itâÂÂs up there with the best sports in the world. I just donâÂÂt think itâÂÂs set up structurally to get to where it could be. Hopefully we can change that, bring more investment in and then get more powerful forces to drive it on.â Sixteen years on and still more rivers to cross.
