Cummins says he was âÂÂgenuinely shockedâ this week amid the comments in KhawajaâÂÂs book. He went on:
When he says we all knew, if that he means we knew sandpaper was going out on the field, heâÂÂs 100% wrong. I said that consistently for the last eight years. I did not know that was happening â¦
He says that I and others were architects of a scheme to ball-tamper with sandpaper. ThatâÂÂs complete and utter nonsense.
Cummins goes on to say he believes KhawajaâÂÂs book has âÂÂbeen casual with my lives and the lives of many others, and I think Australian cricketâÂÂ.

âÂÂWe have moved onâÂÂ
Cummins said heâÂÂs been frustrated KhawajaâÂÂs book is relitigating an episode from more than eight years ago, adding it had reopened trauma for some:
ItâÂÂs eight and a half years, we have moved on.
WeâÂÂll keep saying it but, again, these are peopleâÂÂs lives. It was traumatic for some of them. They have had to work through quite a bit to get out the other side.
So again, thatâÂÂs why IâÂÂm really disappointed and frustrated this week ⦠how itâÂÂs been dealt with so flippantly.
Cummins says thereâÂÂs a âÂÂproper way to do thingsâÂÂ
Cummins says he believes there was a proper way to handle the sandpaper incident, pointing to the Cricket Australia investigation shortly afterwards.
Cricket AustraliaâÂÂs chief executive, Todd Greenberg, told media this week there was not âÂÂany compelling reasonâ to revisit the investigation, even though there are âÂÂspecific detailsâ in KhawajaâÂÂs book âÂÂthat contradict the versions that have been provided by othersâÂÂ.
Cummins goes on:
ThereâÂÂs a very proper way to do things and improve. I think that investigation was a proper way to do it.
Everyone was asked in the circumstances about a game very quickly after. So thatâÂÂs for CA. I think you can maybe argue whether the judgements were fair, but what can you do? I got asked all the questions, answered them all fairly.

âÂÂI think heâÂÂs wrongâÂÂ, Cummins says
A reporter just asked about the difference in stories. Cummins replied:
ThatâÂÂs my story, so I think heâÂÂs wrong.
He went on to say there appeared to be a âÂÂfew big leapsâ in the book and Khawaja had been âÂÂvagueâ and acted in a âÂÂvery casual matterâÂÂ:
The details really matter in that difference. So perhaps there was conversations with Cameron Bancroft around taking sandpaper out and how to do it. That doesnâÂÂt mean that everyone in that dressing room knew what was going on.

Pat Cummins:
There was no master plan around using illegal methods. I think thatâÂÂs maybe something that hasnâÂÂt been spoken about enough. People assume you have gone from very legal methods to suddenly taking sandpaper and then there must have been some huge master plan.
That is not the case â¦
ThereâÂÂs no grand plan, thereâÂÂs no team meeting, thereâÂÂs no bowlers saying âÂÂthis is what must happenâÂÂ.
Cummins: âÂÂI did not see anything on the ballâÂÂ
Cummins was asked how the ball looked at the time.
At that stage, you know, even the umpires had a look. We didnâÂÂt know it had been altered with sandpaper.
Balls get roughened up every time we play. So, you know, whether thatâÂÂs from a foreign object or something thatâÂÂs totally legal and part of the game. Sometimes itâÂÂs hard to know. But out there in the field I did not see anything on the ball.
Cummins says he was âÂÂgenuinely shockedâ this week amid the comments in KhawajaâÂÂs book. He went on:
When he says we all knew, if that he means we knew sandpaper was going out on the field, heâÂÂs 100% wrong. I said that consistently for the last eight years. I did not know that was happening â¦
He says that I and others were architects of a scheme to ball-tamper with sandpaper. ThatâÂÂs complete and utter nonsense.
Cummins goes on to say he believes KhawajaâÂÂs book has âÂÂbeen casual with my lives and the lives of many others, and I think Australian cricketâÂÂ.

Cummins is fronting the media now.

Khawaja memoir âÂÂreadable, surprisingly revealing, sometimes painfully frankâÂÂ
Gideon Haigh, writing for the Guardian this week, says the greatest shame of the controversy inflamed by Usman KhawajaâÂÂs memoir, Sabr, is that âÂÂ99% of those opining about it will never read itâÂÂ.
They will experience it by quotes and summaries, magnified and distorted, elided and exaggerated, shaped by voyeurism and schadenfreude.
In fact, Sabr is a readable, surprisingly revealing, sometimes painfully frank book about a unique career.
Haigh says Khawaja was among the most talented batters in an Australian generation âÂÂwhen it was not in oversupplyâÂÂ, but points out he played in only 22% of the national teamâÂÂs total fixtures over that period.
If he developed a carapace to deal with such endless disappointment, should that surprise anyone?
Sabr might mean patience or resilience in Urdu, but a strength of KhawajaâÂÂs testament is that he allows the impatience to show through.
It is a cranky book because, perhaps, a degree of crankiness is what it takes to come back and back and back, when one is never sure oneâÂÂs abilities are appreciated and oneâÂÂs face fits.
Read more here:
Starc statement: âÂÂwe werenâÂÂt aware of things being taken on the fieldâÂÂ
Earlier this week, Mitchell Starc denied claims made in KhawajaâÂÂs book.
Starc broke his silence to address KhawajaâÂÂs comments, saying he was not aware that sandpaper was used in the Test before Cape Town, nor during the Newlands match. The paceman said his recollection of the match had not changed from what the bowlers said in a statement issued in 2021, which denied all knowledge of the ball-tampering plan.
He said:
As far as our statement said, we werenâÂÂt aware of things being taken on the field, thatâÂÂs where IâÂÂll leave it. We werenâÂÂt aware anything was taken on to the field to be tampered with. We saw [the sandpaper] on the big screen in Cape Town.
As far as the book is concerned, I havenâÂÂt read it. I probably wonâÂÂt read it. So thatâÂÂs for Usman to elaborate on.
IâÂÂll stick to what I said five years ago, what I said at the time, eight years ago. Clearly, thereâÂÂs different versions from different people, and IâÂÂll leave it where I left it back then.
Read more:
In 2018, during the third Test against South Africa in Cape Town, AustraliaâÂÂs opening batter, Cameron Bancroft, was caught on TV using sandpaper against one side of the cricket ball.
An investigation revealed the tampering was planned by the captain, Steve Smith, and vice-captain, David Warner. Both, as well as Bancroft, received bans from international and local cricket.
Fast-forward to now â and former Australian batter Usman Khawaja alleged in his autobiography, Sabr: Finding My Way in Cricket and Life, that the use of sandpaper was widespread.
Khawaja alleged the tampering happened earlier in the series at Port Elizabeth and that the entire team knew about it. Cummins has not commented â until now.
Read more from our reporter, Jack Snape:
The Australian cricket captain, Pat Cummins, is to speak for the first time on the sandpaper scandal since allegations about ball tampering from his former teammate Usman Khawaja.
Cummins posted to social media that he would speak to reporters on Friday morning at Cricket NSWâÂÂs headquarters in Sydney.
IâÂÂm training at Cricket Central tomorrow morning before the Blues play in the Shield match.
Happy to speak with any and all media about the events of this week at 9.30 am.
IâÂÂve taken some time to try and better understand the long list and full extent of UzzyâÂÂs allegations so I can respond properly.
Afterwards please stay and support the Blues!
IâÂÂll ask CA to send out details
Stay with us.
