âÂÂItâÂÂs utter surrealismâÂÂ: VenezuelaâÂÂs Chavistas lament governmentâÂÂs embrace of Trump
Diehard Hugo Chávez supporters struggle to comprehend ideological U-turn being executed by Delcy RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs interim administration
He was one of the most passionate propagandists for Hugo ChávezâÂÂs Bolivarian revolution: a feisty leftist TV personality who spent more than two decades singing the movementâÂÂs praises on his state-funded show, The Razorblade.
Mario SilvaâÂÂs devotion was such that he often hosted his programme with ChávezâÂÂs portrait behind him and he had El ComandanteâÂÂs curly signature tattooed on to his left wrist.

But nine months after VenezuelaâÂÂs political landscape was scrambled by Donald TrumpâÂÂs abduction of ChávezâÂÂs heir, Nicolás Maduro, SilvaâÂÂs show has been cancelled, and its host is livid about the revolutionâÂÂs direction under MaduroâÂÂs former deputy, Delcy RodrÃÂguez.
âÂÂ[I feel] a lot of disappointment â depressed ⦠and sometimes I wake up and feel like the world is collapsing around me,â the 66-year-old said during a rare interview at his home studio in the mountains outside the capital, Caracas.
Silva has spent recent weeks railing against RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs interim administration on YouTube, his home since his programme on state TV was axed, berating those he blames for VenezuelaâÂÂs âÂÂshameful and utterly illegitimate surrenderâ to the US.
Since January, a parade of high-ranking US officials â including the head of the CIA, the chair of the joint chiefs of staff and the energy secretary, Chris Wright â have visited Caracas, while Trump recently trumpeted striking âÂÂthe biggest oil deal in world historyâ with RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs regime. Last week, RodrÃÂguez and Trump met on the sidelines of the UN general assembly, posing for a smiley photograph that left diehard Chavistas such as Silva aghast.
âÂÂI thought it [the photo] was artificial intelligence or something like that. But itâÂÂs surrealism, utter surrealism ⦠ItâÂÂs impossible to understand,â Silva fumed on YouTube as a red flag emblazoned with the faces of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels and Vladimir Lenin hung behind him.

âÂÂThey have surrendered this country and surrendered it the most vile and despicable way,â Silva went on. âÂÂHonestly, they are dragging the countryâÂÂs name through the mud. They are dragging ChávezâÂÂs name through the mud.âÂÂ
In another broadcast, Silva seethed about the cosy post-Maduro relationship that has developed between one-time anti-imperialist flagbearers in Caracas and Trump officials: âÂÂTraitors and lackeys, you will have to answer for this!âÂÂ
Silva is not the only Chavista loyalist struggling to comprehend the ideological U-turn being executed by RodrÃÂguez, who was MaduroâÂÂs vice-president but has engineered a historic rapprochement with the US since his rendition on 3 January.
ElÃÂas Jaua, a vice-president and foreign minister under Chávez, is also up in arms, and claims the feeling is widely shared. âÂÂWhat I hear from comrades across the country is bewilderment, disagreement and indignation,â said Jaua, who believes TrumpâÂÂs oil deal âÂÂamounts to an act of pillage against an entire nationâÂÂ.

Juan Barreto, a former member of the ruling Socialist party (PSUV) and mayor of Caracas, said such an agreement would have been unimaginable when the Bolivarian revolution began after ChávezâÂÂs 1998 election. He said Chavistas, who had once vowed âÂÂNot a drop of oil to the empire if Venezuela is attacked!âÂÂ, were now in effect saying: âÂÂAll of the oil reserves [for the US], for as long as you want!âÂÂ
âÂÂThe current situation is one of tutelage,â Barreto said.
RodrÃÂguez has defended the deal, claiming it will create more than $209bn (ã158bn) in revenues that will help improve healthcare and education. âÂÂWe are thinking of VenezuelaâÂÂs future,â she said in a recent TV broadcast.
Héctor RodrÃÂguez, another prominent Chavista politician, has sought to deflect criticism of VenezuelaâÂÂs interim government by recalling how Chávez was forced to make a tactical retreat after his failed coup attempt in 1992. âÂÂNo one can tell me Chávez was a coward. He understood that the balance of power had shifted ⦠and decided to take a step backwards,â RodrÃÂguez said recently.
âÂÂLast week as Delcy RodrÃÂguez met Trump in New York, thousands of people âÂÂjoined a pro-government rallâÂÂy in Caracas, where supporters parroted the slogan âÂÂDelcy avanza, tú tienes mi confianza!â (âÂÂMove forward, Delcy. I trust in you!âÂÂ).

âÂÂNo matter how much they kick and scream, thereâÂÂs nothing they can do to try to cover up the success of President Delcy RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs visit to New York,â her interior minister, Diosdado Cabello, âÂÂtold the crowd. Unlike at previous marches, there was scant mention of Maduro and few calls for him to be released.
The depth and potential consequences of Chavista anger over RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs embrace of VenezuelaâÂÂs longtime foes in Washington remain unclear.
Orlando Pérez, a Latin America expert from the University of North Texas at Dallas, recognised there was indignation at what some considered a sellout of their anti-imperialist ideals. âÂÂThere are Chavistas that are pissed off, thereâÂÂs no question about it,â he said. âÂÂThere are Chavistas who see this as a betrayal of Hugo Chávez and the betrayal of the movement.âÂÂ
But Pérez believed that for many Chavistas who had remained in power after TrumpâÂÂs invasion, the âÂÂpragmatic realityâ was that working with Washington was âÂÂa necessary evilâ if it meant keeping VenezuelaâÂÂs opposition out of power.
âÂÂIf that means negotiating with Trump, if that means dealing with the CIA etc, itâÂÂs fine,â he said. âÂÂBeyond whatever ideological position they might have ⦠I suspect most of them are gritting their teeth and just going along with this process as long as they can stay in power and keep their jobs. I think for most itâÂÂs as simple as that: itâÂÂs about their material wellbeing.âÂÂ
However, Pérez believed RodrÃÂguezâÂÂs government would need to demonstrate to supporters âÂÂtangible benefits to the cooperationâ with the US in order to avoid a backlash. âÂÂTheyâÂÂre going to have to show that these things have a material consequence to the lives of their social base ⦠if you donâÂÂt deliver, then it is going to get very volatile,â he warned.

So far there has been no sign of significant resistance from outraged supporters of Chavismo. But Silva claimed the governmentâÂÂs new direction and economic policies could eventually trigger a social uprising and protests.
âÂÂWorsening economic conditions will degrade [peopleâÂÂs] quality of life, and that pressure is bound to explode. It has to explode â itâÂÂs not just wishful thinking. This isnâÂÂt a prediction born of desire, itâÂÂs an inevitability,â said the broadcaster, who has claimed he is facing investigation for alleged acts of âÂÂaggravated defamation and slander against the interim governmentâÂÂ.
Silva lit one cigarette after another as he recalled the early hours of 3 January 2026 when, as US troops swept into VenezuelaâÂÂs capital, he realised the revolution he had spent more than 20 years defending was not going to defend itself.
The Chavista broadcaster said he moved from one strategic point to another across Caracas before finally calling the commander at his assigned post. âÂÂI said: âÂÂHey, what happened? Where are the weapons?âÂÂâ Silva recalled, his face settling into a sad grin as he remembered the answer. âÂÂGo to sleep, Mario,â he was told.
Silva pauses. âÂÂYou have no idea how disappointed I was.âÂÂ
