
UK Football Police Unit accused of âÂÂbringing Hillsboroughâ into alcohol debate
UKFPU cites post-Hillsborough Taylor Report in backing ban
âÂÂThe disaster was not caused by alcohol. Full stopâÂÂ
English footballâÂÂs leading fansâ group has criticised the UK Football Policing Unit for âÂÂbringing Hillsborough into the debateâ around drinking in sight of the pitch.
Talk of changing the law to allow fans to drink at their seat or in the stands has resurfaced after Andy Burnham, the prime minister, said the rules were outdated and discriminatory and should be scrapped.
The Football Supportersâ Association (FSA) immediately backed his call but the UKFPU urged caution, stating: âÂÂFollowing a number of football-related tragedies, changes in legislation were implemented after the Taylor Report for good reason and we are currently in the longest ever period without a significant football-related disaster.âÂÂ
The UKFPU added it would be âÂÂincredibly rash to make fundamental changes without a full examination of the evidenceâÂÂ.
âÂÂThe UKFPU would welcome a meeting with the prime minister to discuss his views and explain the challenges these proposed changes would bring to policing and the safety of staff and fans at football games.
âÂÂOther sports simply donâÂÂt see the violence and criminal behaviour from their supporters that football does, albeit a minority, with alcohol often playing a significant part in violent and disorderly behaviour. It would be irresponsible to fuel this by allowing greater alcohol consumption during games.âÂÂ
The Taylor Report referenced by the UKFPU was commissioned in the wake of the 1989 Hillsborough disaster, which resulted in the deaths of 97 Liverpool fans.
The FSA published a thread on its X account setting out its position on drinking in the stands, which began: âÂÂArguably the most important point is that the UK Football Policing UnitâÂÂs comments bringing Hillsborough into this debate have to be corrected. The disaster was not caused by alcohol. Full stop.
âÂÂFans were âÂÂunlawfully killed and a catalogue of failings by police and the ambulance services contributed to their deathsâÂÂ.âÂÂ
The UKFPU has been contacted for comment.
BurnhamâÂÂs comments have sparked social media debate in which differing views have been expressed by match-going fans.
The FSAâÂÂs post on Thursday added: âÂÂItâÂÂs unfair to criminalise fans for having a pint â especially since you can sit in the same seat drinking alcohol whilst watching an Oasis gig or rugby league. We are fundamentally sceptical of any law which is only targeted at football supporters.
âÂÂThat doesnâÂÂt mean every club should be forced to serve alcohol to every seat! A club should have the choice to do what is right for its fans. Consultation is critical, some stadiums or stands might not be suitable (eg family areas) whereas it might be popular elsewhere.
âÂÂUltimately, we think clubs, in liaison with their supporters, should be able to determine what is best for themselves, rather than relying on legislation which is decades old and was written through the prism of viewing all football fans as potential hooligans.âÂÂ
The Sporting Events (Control of Alcohol) Act 1985 prohibits drinking in sight of the pitch in England and Wales in the top five menâÂÂs leagues.
Burnham said on Wednesday: âÂÂI donâÂÂt think itâÂÂs fair for football fans to be singled out in that way and I made that point. I think that legislation dates to an era where football was very different. And I do believe there is a case to remove that discrimination. There are different ways it could be done, perhaps on a trial basis.
âÂÂBut IâÂÂm not going to back away from whatâÂÂs been a long-held view of mine. I donâÂÂt see how it can be fair that some supporters of one sport can be treated differently from others.âÂÂ
