
The United KingdomâÂÂs government has approved a natural gas project off the coast of Scotland, as the Labour government seeks to balance its climate goals with energy security concerns.
Energy Minister Miatta Fahnbulleh said on Wednesday that the Jackdaw gasfield would begin supplying energy to UK homes by the end of the month and would help to boost the countryâÂÂs energy security.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items- list 1 of 3âÂÂTotally reliant on Mother NatureâÂÂ: UK drought raises water security fears
- list 2 of 3âÂÂNature can recoverâÂÂ: Inside the race to rescue worldâÂÂs crisis-hit wildlife
- list 3 of 3Why a North Sea oilfield is emerging as British PM BurnhamâÂÂs big test
The government said the North Sea project would increase UK gas production by about 6 percent at its peak.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham said the decision will âÂÂprotect hundreds of jobs and help keep millions of homes warmâÂÂ, but stressed it would not hinder the governmentâÂÂs targets on renewable energy.
The government also announced a New Energy Wealth Fund, which will invest in renewable and low-carbon energy projects as part of the green transition.
The fund has been established with an initial 2 billion pounds ($2.7bn), with plans to raise additional funds through tax revenues from North Sea oil and gas.
Higher energy prices amid the Russia-Ukraine war and the United States-Israel war on Iran have weighed on households and businesses, dragging on BritainâÂÂs economy.
Fahnbulleh told UK radio station LBC that the development of Jackdaw would not bring down household energy bills.
âÂÂI think itâÂÂs really important that weâÂÂre honest about this,â Fahnbulleh said.
âÂÂThat was not a consideration in the decision because it wonâÂÂt mean cheaper bills. This was about energy security.âÂÂ
The announcement has drawn criticism from left-wing politicians and environmental groups.
Zack Polanski, the leader of the opposition Green Party, described the decision as âÂÂclimate vandalismâÂÂ.
âÂÂSurreal to hear [the] energy secretary try and say this is a âÂÂpragmatic decisionâÂÂ,â Polanski wrote in a post on X.
âÂÂIt will do nothing to lower bills. It will do lots for the profits of the oil and gas companies. And will continue us further down the path of floods and wildfires.âÂÂ
Environmental group Greenpeace said the decision showedàâÂÂthe toxic grip fossil fuel lobbyists still hold over our energy policyâÂÂ.
âÂÂTrue pragmatism means severing our reliance on expensive oil and gas that leaves British households broke, supercharges extreme weather, and leaves our energy security at the mercy of petrostates,â said Ami McCarthy, head of politics at Greenpeace UK.
