
âÂÂItâÂÂs bordering on exploitationâÂÂ: how pseudoscience is duping football
Cryotherapy chambers and other practices have little evidence behind them, says top performance director
Dr Claire-Marie Roberts was working at Coventry City when she received a call from someone asking whether she knew how much oxygen was in the atmosphere. As the performance director, responsible for optimising playersâ potential, she was accustomed to being pitched the latest gimmick promising miraculous gains. At times, she could receive up to 50 LinkedIn messages a week offering a device, supplement or technology that claimed to produce magical results.
âÂÂIt is only 21%,â the caller told her. ThatâÂÂs GCSE chemistry, she thought. Then came the sales pitch: âÂÂSo what weâÂÂve done is put oxygen in a can and we think you might want to use it.âÂÂ
âÂÂRight ⦠oxygen in a can,â Roberts says, laughing at the memory. Suffice to say, she did not take the caller up on his offer to buy oxygen in a can for CoventryâÂÂs players.
Roberts has spent decades working in elite athlete performance and professional football, including nine years at the Premier League and two at Coventry, where she played a key role in their promotion as Championship champions before joining the Formula One team McLaren as director of human performance in the summer. She is shocked by how professional football is being duped by pseudoscience: from coaches and performance staff misled by snake-oil sellers, to players desperate for a shortcut and with money to burn.
âÂÂItâÂÂs the science-practice gap, which is widening in my experience,â Roberts says. âÂÂI think itâÂÂs getting much worse. ThereâÂÂs so much sparkly marketing behind all these things. ItâÂÂs bordering on exploitation.
âÂÂTheyâÂÂre taking a population that is very susceptible to: âÂÂHow can I hack my performance advantage? How can I shortcut my preparation and recovery?â Which I donâÂÂt think is a great starting point.âÂÂ
Roberts says some of the practices commonplace in elite football have little evidence behind them. She includes cryotherapy chambers â a common feature at elite training grounds. If unavailable, ice baths are a fallback. Players enjoy them so much that Harry Kane was photographed standing in a wheelie bin full of ice after a Bayern Munich match at last yearâÂÂs Club World Cup.

âÂÂMost clubs have got cryotherapy chambers â most people cannot articulate to you why they use them, because thereâÂÂs no evidence for them apart from a very slim piece of work that says it might help prevent dementia,â Roberts says. âÂÂThereâÂÂs very sketchy evidence on cryotherapy.âÂÂ
They could even be detrimental to recovery, Roberts says. âÂÂThereâÂÂs a recent suggestion that cryotherapy might blunt muscular adaptation. When are you using it and why are you using it? If youâÂÂre using it for recovery, sleep and nutrition are your best recovery modalities. No amount of putting anybody in a whole-body cryotherapy chamber is going to help them recover more if those two things arenâÂÂt taken care of.âÂÂ
But players are constantly attempting to shortcut nutrition, too. Supplements are a multibillion-pound industry that has its claws in the game. But beyond vitamin D, in which it is âÂÂevidence-basedâ that people in the northern hemisphere are commonly deficient owing to a lack of sunlight, and vitamin C, which is usually short in our diets, supplementation should, Roberts says, be targeted to deficiencies.
âÂÂYouâÂÂve got people popping pills not really asking what theyâÂÂre for. It should always be needs-based. If you donâÂÂt eat fish and fish oil is important to you, you might supplement it. It should all be based on need.
âÂÂYour athletic performance and recovery is based on sleep quality and nutritional quality and amounts. No amount of supplementation will improve a bad diet, but people think it will. We donâÂÂt do enough of the basics and think we can shortcut and hack everything.âÂÂ

Roberts says she used an evidence-based, scientific approach to support Frank LampardâÂÂs squad and that many clubs follow practices from the top of the game when often they are flawed.
âÂÂPeople passively suck these things up,â she says. âÂÂBecause England or Manchester City or Chelsea who have all the resources under the sun have got this, thereâÂÂs a misappropriation of confidence and understanding of the scientific basis or evidence. ItâÂÂs powerful in driving behaviour, but itâÂÂs driving the wrong behaviour.âÂÂ
Roberts, a former swimmer who missed the 1996 Atlanta Olympics owing to injury, says: âÂÂFootball is more susceptible to it than any other sport IâÂÂve experienced first-hand. I think because the stakes are higher.âÂÂ
Kinesiology tape â or k-tape, as it is commonly known â is another trend that baffles Roberts. Players from Cristiano Ronaldo to Gareth Bale and David Beckham have been spotted wearing it over the years, often resembling strips of gaffer tape stuck to limbs.
âÂÂThereâÂÂs no evidence kinesiology tape has any impact on injury prevention or performance-related outcomes. It gives you a bit of proprioception â maybe you feel like someone has done something â but in any environment IâÂÂve worked in youâÂÂd never see anyone wearing k-tape. ItâÂÂs a big white elephant.
âÂÂIf an athlete has dislocated their shoulder, you should strap it â strapping is different. It provides an element of external support that can provide minimal protection to the joint and reminds the person theyâÂÂve got a problem. ItâÂÂs a risk-mitigation strategy. ItâÂÂs not hugely successful, but youâÂÂd do it rather than not do it. K-tape is a placebo.âÂÂ
Often, managers who have been in the game for decades insist on practices they have adopted for years, or because another coach, with no scientific background, has heard about a revolutionary new product. Roberts believes that until football puts science at the centre of decision-making and employs qualified staff to scrutinise claims, the problem will worsen.
âÂÂWe think we can accelerate to an outcome without putting the hard yards in â the basic things: diet and sleep and the quality of your training,â she says.
âÂÂFootball in general is very anti-intellectual and it has been for a long time. There are a few clubs that do it well, but the majority donâÂÂt. The game is definitely anti-science. ThereâÂÂs a reason for that. There isnâÂÂt a critical mass of people that are applying critical thought to situations.âÂÂ
