The Fifa president, Gianni Infantino, proposed an outside review of how the governing body ⁠makes major decisions on ⁠Monday, acknowledging in a ​letter to members that its handling of a now-abandoned investment plan had caused concern.

“First, I will ask the council whether it wishes to commission an independent external review ⁠of Fifa’s current governance framework for major strategic initiatives and recommend potential improvements,” Infantino wrote to the Fifa council and all 211 member association presidents.

He also said ⁠he would propose consultations with confederations, member associations and other stakeholders on strengthening Fifa’s decision-making. The proposals would examine who has ​a say in major initiatives, including the respective roles ‌of the president, bureau, council and ‌congress; and how to improve transparency and accountability.

Infantino faced a fierce backlash over his proposal to sell a 20% stake ‌in Fifa’s commercial rights, including the World Cup, to private investors. The plan was abandoned in July after opposition and boycott threats, with Uefa, the Asian Football Confederation and Concacaf subsequently calling for changes to Fifa’s leadership.

Infantino said the abandoned plan had explored whether selling a minority stake in a Fifa-controlled commercial company could raise more money for football development. It would not have involved giving up control over sporting decisions, he said.

But the proposal became public before ‌it could be presented in full to the council and member associations, according to Infantino. “I recognise that, without the full context, this caused concern and created the impression that decisions had already ​been taken. They had not.

“It remained a proposal, not a decision, and was always subject to the necessary approvals of the council and the member associations. It has now been withdrawn and will not proceed.”

Infantino said he had heard differing ideas about who should decide major strategic questions. Some favoured requiring unanimous agreement in the bureau, while others wanted such matters put directly to ⁠congress and the member associations.

“My role is not to pre-judge that discussion. Those who support ​a particular model should have the opportunity ​to set out their case clearly,” he ​wrote.

Suggestions received by the 15 October council meeting could be discussed there, with later submissions also ​considered by a deadline yet ‌to be specified. ​Any changes to Fifa’s statutes ​would need congress approval.

Infantino also said member associations’ positions on proposals or governance matters would not affect their treatment by Fifa, whose development and solidarity programmes would continue under existing rules.

“No association’s treatment will depend on its position on any proposal or institutional matter,” he wrote. “I remain fully committed to leading Fifa and confident in what we can achieve together.”