For decades, the unwritten rule of venture capital was that a firm doesnâÂÂt back two companies that compete head-on. But speaking at TechCrunch Disrupt earlier this week, the partners of Benchmark readily acknowledged that the AI boom is straining that rule.
ItâÂÂs been on the verge of snapping for some time. The towering AI labs OpenAI and Anthropic share dozens of the same investors at this point. Then, at the end of September, Factory, a startup that builds an AI agent to write software, said it was firing board observer and adviser Chris Degnan for âÂÂunethical conduct involving Cognition,â its direct rival and the maker of the Devin coding agent. FactoryâÂÂs CEO alleged Degnan had discussed a job at Cognition while privy to FactoryâÂÂs board-level discussions. Degnan said he had already resigned and denied sharing anything confidential. Soon after, he announced he was joining Cognition as chief revenue officer. Powerhouse investor Vinod Khosla sided with Degnan on X, blasting FactoryâÂÂs CEO and calling the company âÂÂa struggling second tier competitor.â Khosla Ventures backs both companies.
Even Benchmark, a firm whose reputation rests on 10-to-15-year partnerships with founders at the earliest stage, said the old rule can no longer be counted on. Asked at Disrupt whether the pact against backing rivals still holds as portfolio companies expand into each otherâÂÂs territory, its partners described the conflicts as a matter of necessity, not preference.
âÂÂThe harsh reality of this world is every company is evolving very quickly,â said Eric Vishria. Companies pivot and change, he said, and âÂÂyou are going to get conflicts, and thatâÂÂs just the reality of the current dynamic.âÂÂ
Vishria said Benchmark stays committed to each founder and keeps what it learns confidential, and he downplayed how much a VC could pass along anyway: âÂÂWe are not product or technology experts.â Seemingly referring to the Factory-Cognition dispute, he said Benchmark has been fortunate not to land in âÂÂthat type of insane direct conflict.â Exclusivity, he said, remains âÂÂreally importantâ at the very early stage Benchmark favors. âÂÂBut things are evolving. ThereâÂÂs no doubt about that.âÂÂ
Chetan Puttagunta said AI is accelerating the problem. As the cost of building software âÂÂeffectively goes to zero,â he said, founders are âÂÂincredibly ambitious.â Because they now see a âÂÂsurface areaâ and want to claim all of it, he continued, âÂÂ[i]tâÂÂs probably going to happen more, where you start to run into each other.âÂÂ
He drew a line between a direct competitor at the outset, which he called âÂÂan easy answer,â and a portfolio company that expands into anotherâÂÂs turf over time. âÂÂThat happens,â he said.
Peter Fenton called the issue âÂÂkryptoniteâ and the firmâÂÂs toughest problem. He described a spectrum of how investors relate to their companies. At one end is the co-founder, who would never work on a competing company. At the other is the public-market stock picker, who can own several rivals because he is merely allocating capital, not shaping any of them. Benchmark sits nearer the co-founder end, Fenton said, and treats transparency as a golden rule. âÂÂThere shouldnâÂÂt be the surprise after the fact.â If a conflict does emerge, a founder should never feel shortchanged, he added.
Benchmark isnâÂÂt declaring the pact dead. At the same time, when a firm that built its name on loyalty says conflicts are coming, founders might rightly wonder who else will be this candid.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesnâÂÂt affect our editorial independence.
