Brazilian court orders Meta to prove Lula and Bolsonaro get equal treatment

Brazil’s top electoral court has doubled a daily fine for the United States-based social media company Meta, saying it failed to comply with an order about how political content is shown on its platforms.

On Monday, the Superior Electoral Court (TSE) gave Meta 24 hours to show that it is not favouring one presidential candidate over the other in its content feeds.

The decision comes less than a week before Brazilians vote in a presidential run-off that pits left-wing incumbent Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva against right-wing senator Flavio Bolsonaro.

“The continued noncompliance, just a few days before the run-off election, demonstrates that the fine imposed was insufficient,” a TSE judge said in Monday’s order.

The penalty for noncompliance was also increased in the order, from 500,000 Brazilian reals ($100,000) to one million reals ($200,000).

The court order is in response to a complaint from Lula’s campaign that Meta prevented his profile from being fully promoted on Instagram and from being visible in searches.

His campaign has also argued that posts by Lula’s supporters are being disproportionately taken down by moderators, who are instead allowing content promoting his rival or questioning the integrity of elections.

Civil society groups and digital rights monitors have supported those allegations, saying Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — three platforms run by Meta — have suppressed content from the left-leaning leader while boosting posts promoting Bolsonaro.

Meta has denied favouring either candidate on its platforms, although it admits some of Lula’s campaign ads were taken offline temporarily due to technical errors.

Lula and Bolsonaro are set to face off in a final round of voting on Sunday. Bolsonaro, the son of an imprisoned former president, performed better than many analysts expected in the first round of voting on October 4.

He garnered 47 percent of the vote, compared with Lula’s 45 percent. Neither, however, crossed the 50-percent threshold needed to avoid a run-off. Pre-election polling puts the two virtually neck-and-neck going into Sunday’s vote.

Social media bias has been a point of contention on both sides of Brazil’s political sphere.

Earlier this month, Lula’s campaign launched a website to document complaints from supporters about their activities being unfairly restricted on Meta and other social media platforms.

Several digital rights groups, such as the nonprofit CTRL+Z, have published findings that suggest Meta may have helped Bolsonaro have an outsized presence on its platforms, which many in Brazil use as their main source of news.

“Brazilian citizens have the right to know why their accounts were banned, why their posts disappeared, why their accounts lost reach, and why they are being prevented from commenting, reposting, and saving content,” CTRL+Z wrote on its website.

“Meta cannot be the invisible judge of the Brazilian electoral debate.”

On Friday, the Brazilian newspaper Folha de S Paulo reported it had reviewed internal messages between Meta employees acknowledging they were aware of the inconsistent treatment of Lula and Bolsonaro’s social media presence.

Despite that revenue, da Silva said that Meta and other companies were not taking their responsibility towards election fairness seriously.

“These are very powerful, wealthy companies, and they do have the capacity to do much more than they are doing,” she told Al Jazeera.

More than 100 civil society groups, including Greenpeace International, Global Witness and Oxfam Brazil, have joined CTRL+Z to sign a letter calling on Brazilian authorities to enforce rules meant to rein in Meta.

They have also pushed the company itself to do a better job removing deepfakes and disinformation, and to provide clear rules on how it moderates content.

“We want transparency regarding moderation criteria, a human review channel, and timely responses to protect the election,” the group said on its website.