
Arizona accuses LâÂÂOréal of concealing cancer risks linked to hair relaxers
Democratic attorney general seeks damages and penalties in legal action that echoes thousands of similar suits
Arizona has sued LâÂÂOréal that the French cosmetics company hid evidence that its hair relaxer products â could cause cancer in women â echoing thousands of similar lawsuits from users and their families.
Arizona attorney general Kristin Mayes, a â Democrat, filed the lawsuit late â on Thursday in âÂÂstate court. The lawsuit makes Arizona the first state to sue over alleged cancer risks linked to hair relaxers. It also alleges that LâÂÂOréal is violating â state consumer protection laws by marketing the hair relaxer products that are used predominantly by African American women without warning consumers about the alleged risks of ovarian and uterine cancers.
The â state of Arizona is seeking penalties and damages, as well as a court order forcing LâÂÂOreal to stop âÂÂselling the products unless it warns of âÂÂthe cancer risk.
In marketing the âÂÂproducts to women and children over decades, LâÂÂOréal and associated companies âÂÂexploited centuries of social pressures and âÂÂdiscriminatory beauty standards affecting people of African descent, all while prioritizing profit over consumer safetyâÂÂ, ArizonaâÂÂs lawsuit claims.
The lawsuit comes as LâÂÂOréal faces more than 12,000 similar lawsuits filed by women or their families that have been consolidated in a Chicago federal court as part of a multi-district litigation proceeding, a procedure designed to more efficiently manage lawsuits filed in multiple jurisdictions.
A spokesperson âÂÂfor LâÂÂOréal did not immediately respond to a request for comment. LâÂÂOréal has said its products are subject to rigorous safety reviews and the company is âÂÂconfident that the claims are without legal or scientific merit.
The products, which have been marketed under the names Dark and Lovely, Optimum and other brands, promise to permanently straighten textured hair.
The first lawsuits hit the docket after the 2022 release of a study done by the National Institutes â of Health (NIH) that found women who used the products several times a âÂÂyear were more than twice as âÂÂlikely to develop uterine cancer.
The âÂÂlawsuits seek damages to compensate the women for their pain and suffering and âÂÂeconomic damages for âÂÂmedical bills and the cost âÂÂof the products, âÂÂamong other things.
The lawsuits name LâÂÂOréal and Revlon and other makers of the products. Revlon has also denied a connection between cancer and the products.
The multi-district litigation continues to move forward, court records show, and trials could begin in 2027.
