BCCI has invited hassle on itself over a possible trademark infringement. The Delhi Excessive Court docket has issued the Indian cricket board a authorized discover over naming the AI robotic ‘Champak’. The favored youngsters’s comedian journal, Champak, has complained to the BCCI of trademark infringement. The Delhi Excessive Court docket has demanded the BCCI to answer Champak’s allegations.
The Delhi Excessive Court docket has ordered the BCCI to present its clarification on the difficulty with a written assertion and abstract inside a month. The upcoming listening to of the case has been scheduled to happen on July 9. Delhi Press, the writer of the journal, has filed the case in opposition to the Indian Cricket Board for a possible trademark violation.
Additionally Learn: IPL 2025: RR vs MI, Match 50 – Stats preview of participant data and approaching milestones
The AI robotic was formally launched within the IPL throughout the match between Mumbai Indians and Delhi Capitals in thr twenty ninth match of the 2025 version. The official deal with of the league took to social media and posted a video of its unveiling, which caught the eye of followers, gamers, and everybody else.
The whole lot to learn about BCCI’s AI robotic, ‘Champak’
Commentators and gamers received an opportunity to work together with the distinctive robotic, which resembled the physique of a canine and was versatile sufficient. Whereas many beloved the concept of getting a robotic within the broadcasting group, many puzzled why the title of the AI robotic was Champak.
Among the gamers, equivalent to Hardik Pandya, MS Dhoni, Kuldeep Yadav, Mohammed Siraj, and others, interacted with the robotic, and their movies have been shared on social media platforms. Likewise, the commentators and the members of the broadcasting group like Danny Morrison, Pommie Mbangwa, and others interacted with it.
The case between the BCCI and the Delhi Press might warmth up within the subsequent few months, because the journal Champak has been a family title for years. The BCCI might need a tough time profitable the case, because the board has to defend itself in opposition to a longtime journal.